![]() ![]() Here, there honestly isn't much difference. ![]() The next component is the kernel itself (not the UI, but the code that actually talks to the hardware, the true OS). ![]() NTFS handles file fragmentation very differently than the ext file system, and with 100k+ files, there's a good chance there's some fragmentation. ![]() Fragmentation of the files can also play a role in speeds. the NTFS system (which could mean 4x the files depending on what's stored where/how and how big, etc.). The default for most systems is a 4096 byte 1, 2 cluster size, but if you formatted your ext4 partition to something like 16k 3 then each read on the ext4 system would get 4x the data vs. It could be as well that one partition is formatted in smaller chunks than the other. Since the file system itself is what governs how and where files are accessed, if you're using ext4 there's a likely chance you'll notice an improvement to speed over NTFS note however if you used ext2 you might notice that it's comparable in speed. The ext file system had it's last major stable release ( ext4) in 2008. The NTFS file system itself hasn't changed since Windows XP (2001), a lot of features that exist (like partition shrinking/healing, transactional NTFS, etc.) are features of the OS (Windows Vista/7/8/10) and not NTFS itself. Going backwards, NTFS has been the de-facto for Windows for some time, while the de-facto for the major Linux variants is the ext file system. The basics of it break down to a few key components of the total system: the UI element (the graphical part), the kernel itself (what talks to the hardware), and the format in which the data is stored (i.e. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |