![]() Īnimal zoos provide many controversies spanning to the modern day, as human expositions diminished in prominence in the 20th century. One imperialist view of the whole non-Western world portrayed it as a vast animal park in which Whites could function as zookeepers-managers of the indigenous human and non-human inhabitants. Such displays featured in multiple colonial exhibitions and at temporary exhibitions in animal zoos. ![]() They then developed into independent displays emphasizing the exhibits' inferiority to western culture and providing further justification for their subjugation. They began as a part of circuses and " freak shows" which displayed exotic humans in a manner akin to a caricature which exaggerated their differences. Throughout their existence such exhibitions garnered controversy over their demeaning, derogatory, and dehumanizing nature. The idea of a "savage" derives from Columbus's voyages that deemed European culture remained pure, while other cultures were titled impure or "wild", and this stereotype relies heavily on the idea that different ways of living were "cast out by God", as other cultures do not recognize Christianity in relation to Creation. These displays sometimes emphasized the supposed inferiority of the exhibits' culture, and implied the superiority of " Western society", through tropes that purported marginalized groups as "savage". They were most prominent during the 19th and 20th centuries. Human zoos, also known as ethnological expositions, were public displays of people, usually in a so-called "natural" or "primitive" state. Louis World's Fair Natives of Tierra del Fuego, brought to Paris by the Maître in 1889 ![]() A group of Igorot displayed at a human zoo during the St. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |